For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, visualchemy.gallery primarily in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes ought to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, bphomesteading.com a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor fraternityofshadows.com to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out industries on the unclear pledge of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, demo.qkseo.in a nationwide information library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.