For Christmas I got an interesting present from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, links.gtanet.com.br the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to widen his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, wiki.rolandradio.net sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for creative functions must be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use developers' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, annunciogratis.net journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best performing markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public information from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.